Monday, June 8, 2015

Outlining the ways linguistics and choreography intersect

ChoreoLinguistics: An experiment in interdisciplinarity, or the (un)likely pairing of choreography and linguistics in a liberal arts setting

Why should we think about language and dance together? What are the ways in which language/linguistics and dance/choreography intersect?  How specifically might we think about choreography and syntax as two sides of the same coin/exploring the same ideas/aiming for the same goals?

1)   Both language and dance are communicative practices, labeled as “basic” human communication tools (by whom?  What sources can we rely on here?)
2)   Language is a mechanism for communication with inherent structure.   Choreographed dance is also a mechanism for communication with inherent structure. What happens when you overlay the structure of language on top of a choreographed piece?  Is it possible to use the structure of choreography to study language?
a.     What are the meaningful units in language/dance?  How do we identify them?  What characteristics do we rely on?
b.     What is the underlying structure of these meaningful units?
c.      How do we put these units together into larger units and how do we use them to communicate?
d.     What about the larger structure of conversation?  How might conversational analysis interact with the conversation of a performance?
e.     Both linguistics and choreography involve codifying structure.
3)   Choreographers and speakers exercise choice when putting these units together.
a.     Languages are said to choose between explicitness and economy (e.g. Haspelmath 1999)
b.     Choreographers choose to highlight elements through a variety of tools, e.g. contrast, repetition, etc.
c.      How might explicitness and economy apply to choreography?
d.     How might choreographic choices also be evident in language choice?
4)   Both dance and language involve movement of the body.
a.     The production of spoken language involves movement of articulators such as the tongue, velum, jaw, and vibration of the vocal folds.  It also involves modulated air flow.
b.     Spoken language may be accompanied by gesture.
c.      The production of signed language involves movement of the hands, arms, and fingers, as well as parts on the face such as the eyebrows, and movement of the shoulders.
d.     Signed language may be accompanied by spoken gestures.
e.     What types of body movement statements would you make about dance?
f.      Note that the creation of music also requires movement.
5)   Choreographers and linguists study motion of the body
a.     Choreographers need and use vocabulary for describing movement in order to instruct dancers (e.g. Laban notation)
b.     Linguists are interested in how motion is encoded in the lexicon and the language system more generally. (e.g. labeling path vs. manner when describing types of motion verbs)  Include sources
c.      Linguists also study the movements involved in the production of language.
                                               i.     Including sign language, e.g. the parameters of sign are handshape, movement of the sign, location of the sign with respect to the body, orientation of the palm, non-manual markers such as eyebrow raising or shoulder lifting
1.     How might non-manual markers in sign correlate with choreography involving the face?
2.     Could handshape notation function as a tool for choreographers?
6)   Choreographers and linguists share vocabulary across their disciplines:
a.     Phrase
b.     Form (shape)
c.      Vocabulary
d.     movement
e.     narrative (non-narrative narrative)
f.      communicate
g.     embodiment
h.     motivation
i.       Intent
7)   Language is used as a metaphor for examining choreographic structure.  Movement is used in describing syntactic structure.
8)   Choreography is an art; linguistics is a science. What does one learn from the other?

No comments:

Post a Comment